Abstract
Abstract The chapter investigates the significance of the rule of law for private law, first presenting a general account of the rule of law and then turning specifically to private law. The rule of law has the double function of ensuring that the exercise of state power is through law and in accordance with law. The first of these is the aim of Lon Fuller’s desiderata for governing human conduct through legal rules; the second is the concomitant of the separation of legislative, executive, and adjudicative powers in the form of government that Kant termed a ‘republic.’ The rule of law takes as its subject matter the constitutive (and not the regulative) aspects of a republican polity. The rule of law, therefore, differs from the Rechtsstaat, which in its contemporary version incorporates regulative notions of justice. However, taking over the argument of Julius Ebbinghaus, the chapter contends that injustice is to be distinguished from inhumanity (exemplified by Nazism and apartheid), which is never within the competence of legal authority. Turning to private law adjudication, the chapter argues that the retroactivity of adjudicated norms does not violate the rule of law. The separation of powers makes it implausible to assume that Fuller’s desiderata apply to adjudication in the same way that they apply to legislation. The rule of law is satisfied by the antecedent public availability of the legal materials out of which a new adjudicative norm is shaped. Prospective overruling is, accordingly, the solution to a non-existent problem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.