Abstract
Abstract This chapter presents a socio-legal perspective on international commercial arbitration (ICA) that is rooted in the empirical view of contract as developed in a long line of law and society scholarship most prominently associated with Steward Macaulay. As the key feature, such a socio-legal approach to ICA adopts a law-in-action rather than a law-in-books perspective. In this sense, individual actors and organizations do not simply follow the law, but may alter, reinforce, manipulate, or even ignore the law in their daily courses of action. Law is thus assumed to be a living institution embedded in societal structures, rather than an accumulation of formal rules. However, ICA is often misunderstood as a clear-cut, authoritative, and coercive legal mechanism that directly guides individual behavior in cross-border contractual relations without taking into account that the relation between legal institutions and human behavior are in fact much more diffused and shaped by various individual interests, non-legal institutions, and civil power. As a consequence of this naïve legal understanding, existing approaches on ICA tend to perpetuate a number of misleading images about ICA's role in global commerce.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.