Abstract

This study provides a right-based analysis of the rule of law and armed conflict reconstruction implementation practices in Rwanda. It answers the mode of implementation of the ICTR and the Gacaca court system and assessed the consistency of these mechanisms with HRBA principles using a qualitative-content approach. The study revealed the consistency of ICTR operations with the HRBA principle on the rule of law; yet, the Gacaca court system appeared the opposite. Therefore, the need to identify and strengthen specific rule of law mechanisms to prosecute respective human rights and humanitarian law violations to reduce clashes. The study recommends sanctions be applied to all perpetrators of international crimes in accordance with their level of perpetration.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.