Abstract

The rule of Causa promixa (proximate cause) is derived from a latin phrase causa proxima non remota spectator (the immediate, and not the remote cause is to be considered). This article highlights the significance of the rule of causa proxima which is a key principle of insurance and is concerned with how the loss or damage actually occurred and whether it is indeed a result of an insured peril. It primarily discusses about the emphasis laid on the test of proximate cause in Insurance Law, in order to identify the causation of the loss or damage. It makes an effort to substantiate the subject matter by looking into the trends of interpretation of the rule, including in countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, India and Canada.

Highlights

  • ‘Insurance is a method of spreading over a large number of persons a possible financial loss too serious to be conveniently borne by an individual.’

  • It primarily discusses about the emphasis laid on the test of proximate cause in Insurance Law, in order to identify the causation of the loss or damage

  • It was held that the proximate cause of damage being the sea water and rat being the remote cause, the insured cargo was entitled to damages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

‘Insurance is a method of spreading over a large number of persons a possible financial loss too serious to be conveniently borne by an individual.’. Much refinement is needed in this subject It is an established understanding in insurance law that causa sine qua non or remote cause of loss is generally irrelevant. This is embodied in the heart of the maxim causa proxima non remota spectator. Thomes& Mersey Marine Insurance Co9 in which, L.J Smith, after acknowledging the fact that remote causes were generally inconsequential, reminded the court that the maxim causa proxima non remota spectator was qualified by a well established legal maxim dolus circuitu non purgatur, which means that a loss, even though proximately caused by a peril insured against, would not be recoverable if it was occasioned albeit remotely by the wilful misconduct of the assured. Cause here means what a business or seafaring [person] would take to be the cause without too microscopic analysis but on a broad view’

Construing the Rule of Causa Proxima
Perils Relevant to an Insurance Claim
Can There Be Two Proximate Causes?
Judicial Trends in Rejuvenating the Concept of Causa Proxima
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.