Abstract

The transmission of information from an experienced demonstrator to a naïve observer often depends on characteristics of the demonstrator, such as familiarity, success or dominance status. Whether or not the demonstrator pays attention to and/or interacts with the observer may also affect social information acquisition or use by the observer. Here we used a video-demonstrator paradigm first to test whether video demonstrators have the same effect as using live demonstrators in zebra finches, and second, to test the importance of visual and vocal interactions between the demonstrator and observer on social information use by the observer. We found that female zebra finches copied novel food choices of male demonstrators they saw via live-streaming video while they did not consistently copy from the demonstrators when they were seen in playbacks of the same videos. Although naive observers copied in the absence of vocalizations by the demonstrator, as they copied from playback of videos with the sound off, females did not copy where there was a mis-match between the visual information provided by the video and vocal information from a live male that was out of sight. Taken together these results suggest that video demonstration is a useful methodology for testing social information transfer, at least in a foraging context, but more importantly, that social information use varies according to the vocal interactions, or lack thereof, between the observer and the demonstrator.

Highlights

  • Observations of, other individuals occurs across a large range of animals and behaviours, including foraging, mate-choice, tool manufacture and use, nestsite location, and nest-material selection

  • Many of these studies are conducted in the laboratory using a live observer–demonstrator paradigm, which allows control of who provides information to the observer

  • In other tests of social learning of matechoice in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) and tool manufacture and use in chimpanzees sound was not necessary for social learning to occur (Ophir and Galef, 2003; Price et al, 2009). Taken together these results suggests that social learning across species and/or context may require different types/quality of social information/interaction between the observer and the demonstrator

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Observations of, other individuals occurs across a large range of animals and behaviours, including foraging, mate-choice, tool manufacture and use, nestsite location, and nest-material selection (i.e. social learning, e.g., Heyes, 1994, 2012; Auersperg et al, 2014; Guillette et al, 2016; Kendal et al, 2015; Loukola et al, 2012; Trompf and Brown, 2014; Vakirtzis, 2011) Many of these studies are conducted in the laboratory using a live observer–demonstrator paradigm, which allows control of who provides information to the observer. The females who saw the non-interactive videos may have increased their courtship displays to elicit a response from the video male

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.