Abstract

This forum attempts to uncover the role played by theory in three empirical studies. To that end, in the sections that follow, I will begin with the review of literature on language complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Next, I will report on metric indices employed in the studies to measure the phenomenon of linguistic complexity and the results pertaining to grammatical and lexical complexity. Then I proceed with describing the status of theory in empirical research and the challenges research on CAF faces. The closing presents the discussion on how theory impacted the design of the empirical studies sampled for this paper.

Highlights

  • Language proficiency is multi-componential in nature and, according to many SLA researchers and L2 practitioners, is best captured by the concepts of complexity, fluency, and accuracy (CAF)

  • The contrasting findings reported by Kuiken and Vedder in the three studies they reported pointed to the inherent flaw of the Triadic Framework and the predictions of the Cognition Hypothesis

  • The research on complexity, accuracy, and fluency and their interaction in different task conditions seems to occupy a particular position in the debate on how different task environments impact CAF

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Language proficiency is multi-componential in nature and, according to many SLA researchers and L2 practitioners, is best captured by the concepts of complexity, fluency, and accuracy (CAF). The studies that invoke the Cognition Hypothesis either refer to Robinson’s Triadic Framework (Robinson, 2001a) and the Cognition Hypothesis to structure their research and explain the findings, or they take a more radical stand to argue that the premises underlying the Cognition Hypothesis and the claims derived from it are problematic. This forum attempts to uncover the role played by theory in three empirical studies. The closing presents the discussion on how theory impacted the design of the empirical studies sampled for this paper

LITERATURE REVIEW
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.