Abstract

We study the role of the scale of the threshold variable in soft-gluon threshold resummation. We focus on the computation of the resummed total cross section, the final-state invariant-mass distribution, and transverse-momentum distribution of the Higgs boson when produced in association with a top-anti-top quark pair for the Large Hadron Collider operating at 13 TeV. We show that different choices for the scale of the threshold variable result in differences at next-to-leading power, i.e. contributions that are down by one power of the threshold variable. These contributions are noticeable numerically, although their effect on the resummed observables lies within the scale uncertainty of those observables. The average central results, obtained after combining several central- scale choices, agree remarkably well for different choices of the threshold variable. However, different threshold choices do affect the resulting scale uncertainty. To compute our results, we introduce a novel numerical method that we call the deformation method, which aids the stabilization of the inverse Mellin transform in cases where the analytical Mellin transform of the partonic cross section is unknown. We show that this method leads to a factor of 10 less function evaluations, while gaining a factor of 4 − 5 in numerical precision when compared to the standard method.

Highlights

  • To lie within 20 − 30% of the SM value

  • We focus on the computation of the resummed total cross section, the final-state invariant-mass distribution, and transverse-momentum distribution of the Higgs boson when produced in association with a top-anti-top quark pair for the Large Hadron Collider operating at 13 TeV

  • We introduce a novel numerical method that we call the deformation method, which aids the stabilization of the inverse Mellin transform in cases where the analytical Mellin transform of the partonic cross section is unknown

Read more

Summary

Notation and conventions

To set up our notation, we first introduce the tth process at LO. The final state may be created by two partonic processes: gg → tth and qq → tth. One needs to parameterize the three-body phase space in a suitable way to compute the invariant-mass or transverse-momentum distribution. The phase space of the tt-system dΦ2(ptt; pt, pt) may be computed in the CM system of tt This system is denoted by the starred notation (∗), and the direction of travel of the tt-system in the CM system of the incoming particles is used as the z-axis with respect to which the angle θ∗ is defined. The phase space integration of the (tt)h-system dΦ2(p1 + p2; ptt, ph) is evaluated in the partonic CM system, where the four-momenta of the initial-state particles read. Using these definitions, the LO fully differential partonic cross section is written as dσiLjO→tth(s). Having set up our notation, we are ready to turn our attention to the resummation of the tth production process

Resummation of the tth process
Threshold definitions for the invariant-mass distribution
Threshold definitions for the Higgs transverse-momentum distribution
The inverse Mellin transform
Analytical considerations of the inverse Mellin transform
Numerical stability issues of the inverse Mellin transform
The deformation method
Numerical results
Comparison of numerical methods
The invariant-mass distribution
The transverse-momentum distribution
Total cross section
Role of NLP corrections
Discussion
A Useful definitions for NLL resummation
The soft-anomalous dimension matrices
B Kinematics for the top-anti-top-Higgs production process
The boost matrix is
Findings
C The derivative method
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call