Abstract

This article explores the role which courts could play in promoting water security in South Africa. As the country is one of the driest on the continent, its water security issues remain at the forefront of the service delivery conundrum. Therefore, issues of water security often need to be litigated to arrive at a favourable and just outcome. This is where the focus of this article lies. Based on a critical analysis of the legal framework governing water security and relevant case law, the article argues that courts could promote water security by discharging certain duties. Firstly, the courts must uphold the applicable law by weighing the rights and interests that relate to water and must then make reasonable, just and equitable findings. Secondly, the courts must solve water-related disputes between parties by interpreting and applying the applicable laws and policies. It is submitted that by executing these two functions, the courts contribute to a deeper understanding of the water security discourse. Finally, it is argued that through the execution of their traditional judicial functions, courts contribute to the making of law that directly affects water security.

Highlights

  • South Africa is regarded as the 30th most water-scarce country in the world.[1]

  • This article explores the role which courts could play in promoting water security in South Africa

  • In 2019 it was estimated that 44,9% of South African households had access to piped water in their dwellings.[5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

South Africa is regarded as the 30th most water-scarce country in the world.[1]. Pollution, climate change, a rising demand for water, lack of infrastructure as well as the effects of past discriminatory laws further exacerbate this dire situation.[2]. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (hereafter the Constitution), guarantees everyone the right to access to water.[10] This right must be progressively realised through legislative and other measures.[11] This provision suggests positive action from the State, and in terms of the Constitution, the local authorities are responsible for the water supply.[12] It is not strange that in many cases where the legal issue involves water security municipalities are cited as defending parties. The importance of these cases cannot be emphasised enough. Issues of water security follows, and recommendations and concluding remarks are made

Theoretical perspectives on water security
The legal framework addressing water security in South Africa
The mandate and duties of South African courts
A critical analysis of case law
Federation for Sustainable Environment v Minister of Water Affairs79
A critical reflection on the judgment
Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg102
Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg117
A critical reflection on the judgments
Conclusion
Literature
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.