The role of the arrhythmologist in a sports cardiology centre: the devil is in the detail

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction The role of the arrhythmologist in a sports cardiology centre (SCC) is to provide comprehensive care to athletes with cardiac arrhythmias. Objective To determine the proportion of athletes with arrhythmias examined at a SCC. To define the differences in care between an athlete with and without arrhythmia. Methods Retrospective analysis of the registry of all athletes of one SCC. Identification of patients=athletes with arrhythmias, description of key differences in access to arrhythmology subunits. Cohort: Between 1/2020-6/2022, a total of 115 cases of athletes, 100 males and 15 females (13%), aged 26 (+/-11 years), were examined and definitively closed at SCC. Twenty-two athletes (19%) received care for cardiac rhythm disorders. Duration of sports activity was at the borderline of statistical significance in demographic parameters (see Table No. 1), with 15 (+/-11) vs 12 (+/-8) years for athletes with non-arrhythmic diagnoses (p=0.085). Results In the statistical comparison of the groups without and with arrhythmias (Table No. 2), we see a statistically significantly higher proportion of athletes presenting because of symptoms and with pathological findings of the pre-participation screening, with a higher proportion of family history of sudden cardiac death, with a higher proportion of coronary CT use and an extraordinary statistical significance of cardiac MRI use. Conversely, there is no statistically significant difference in diagnosis and impact on sports eligibility. The sports cardiologist must be particularly cautious in the diagnosis and treatment of ventricular extrasystoles, which have a different "diagnostic-eligibility" pathway for athletes. Similarly, they must listen to the medical history more than non-athletes and be willing and able to use various sports monitor records. In invasive methods of diagnosing and treating arrhythmias, it is necessary to understand when arrhythmias occur in real life and try to mimic the diagnostic conditions of this situation (e.g., when inducing clinical arrhythmias that an athlete has in real life during the peak moments of a match or race). Last but not least, the sports cardiologist must communicate the potential changes that may occur by ablative treatment of the arrhythmia (e.g., a decrease in maximal heart rate after AVNRT ablation on the so-called slow pathway, or, e.g. a possible increase in resting heart rate after pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency or laser energy). Conclusion Athletes with arrhythmias are different in many aspects, and the role of the arrhythmologist in the sports cardiology team is to be prepared to respect these differences in an effort to provide the best possible care for the athlete.