Abstract

Contrary to most traditional theories of speech perception, talker-specific information is not filtered out or ‘‘lost’’ during perceptual analysis, but is retained in the processing and representation of spoken language. Effects of talker-specific information have been found for words and phonemes spoken in isolation [J. W. Mullennix and D. B. Pisoni, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 365–378 (1990); Goldinger etal., J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem. Cog. 17, 152–162 (1991)]. However, the processing of spoken sentences may be quite different from isolated words due to coarticulation across words, suprasegmental information, and syntactic and semantic constraints. The present experiment investigates whether the effects of talker-specific information on the processing of sentences are similar to those found for the processing of isolated words and phonemes. Subjects first transcribed lists of sentences in either a single-talker or multiple-talker presentation format; they were given a probed recall test to assess memory for the sentences. While transcription accuracy was higher in the single-talker than the multiple-talker condition, cued recall performance for correctly transcribed sentences was not significantly different between the two presentation conditions. Implications of these findings for current theories of spoken language processing will be discussed in the context of recent episodic and multiple-trace models of human memory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.