Abstract

A refractory strain of the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, melanotically encapsulates and kills many species of malaria parasites, whereas susceptible strains allow the parasites to develop normally. To study the role of surface characteristics in eliciting this immune response, 27 types of chromatography beads that differed in matrix type, charge, functional group, and functional group density were assayed for degree of melanotic encapsulation in refractory and susceptible mosquitoes. Overall, two glucan-based matrices, Sephadex (dextran) and cellulose, stimulated the strongest responses, regardless of functional group. Substituting matrix hydroxyl groups with functional groups on Sephadex and cellulose beads decreased the level of encapsulation. These results demonstrate that glucans induce melanotic encapsulation in An. gambiae. Beads with agarose, polystyrene, and acrylic matrices, and most methacrylate-based beads elicited little or no melanization; however, epoxide–methacrylate beads were encapsulated, demonstrating that glucans are not essential for eliciting a response. Comparisons between the two strains demonstrated that refractory mosquitoes melanized many bead types to a greater degree than did susceptible mosquitoes. On this basis, we propose that an important difference between the two strains is that one of the enzymes involved in the melanization pathway functions at a higher level in the refractory strain. Finally, of all beads tested, only 85% substituted CM-Sephadex beads were virtually unmelanized in susceptible mosquitoes but highly melanized in the refractory strain; thus, a specific surface microenvironment is necessary to demonstrate this effect.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call