Abstract

STEM transformation has been a longstanding goal for higher education institutions who not only wish to maintain global economic competitiveness but most recently have also aimed efforts at achieving STEM equity. While researchers have typically looked to students’ and faculty’s experiences for answers, STEM program directors possess great insight from working closely with students in both faculty and administrative roles. This study explores the views of 45 STEM program directors at 10 institutions across the U.S. that had high STEM bachelor’s degree-completion rates relative to similarly resourced institutions. We document the lessons and strategies that STEM program directors have used to broaden institutional impact, including demonstrating their program’s efficacy through assessments and evaluations, coordinating, and streamlining efforts to ensure program efficiency and longevity, incentivizing support for labor, and consolidating support from institutional leaders. We also disentangle the roles STEM program directors play as grassroots leaders or institutional agents, distinguishing them by their authority and decision-making power and by whether they work to transform the institution to better serve students or to transform students’ behaviors to adapt to the institution. Our findings provide avenues to leverage STEM program directors’ efforts in order to move toward STEM education transformation in higher education.

Highlights

  • Our epistemology most aligns with that of Russ [19], such that we believe STEM experts and STEM

  • This study focused on participants who served as directors of STEM programs in order to highlight STEM program director (PD)’ unique experiences in navigating institutional structures and garnering support for STEM equity

  • The STEM program directors in this study acquired a repertoire of lessons and strategies that can be leveraged to broaden institutional impact when given the proper institutional support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Staff, and administrators who advocate for, support, teach, mentor, and train historically excluded individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have been instrumental in the retention and career advancement of many under-represented scientists. The vision and responsibility of organizing faculty, staff, administrators, and resources toward a coordinated effort to support students within a higher education institution, college, or department is often led by a STEM program director (PD). Ranging from principal investigators of grant-funded STEM diversity initiatives to administrators of institutionally-budgeted math/science tutoring centers, STEM

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call