Abstract

This paper contributes to the sustainability debate by analyzing the inclusion dimension in the responsible research and innovation (RRI) process. RRI is claimed to be an important tool for addressing global challenges and achieving sustainable development goals. While stakeholder involvement is considered to be imperative for the RRI process, there is little empirical evidence on (1) who the stakeholders participating in the RRI process are; (2) when stakeholders participate; (3) how stakeholders’ inclusion contributes to the sustainable innovation process; and (4) who the agents are who orchestrate stakeholders’ inclusion. This paper addresses the issue of stakeholder involvement through the lens of innovation management literature by attempting to link the innovation process to the responsibility concept. We employed a meta-synthesis of empirical studies of RRI to develop a deep understanding of stakeholder inclusion. After screening 139 articles, we identified seven empirical papers highlighting RRI process, mainly from projects nested in academic contexts. The findings indicate that multiple stakeholders are included at a late stage of the innovation process—during the market launch. To some extent, this allows for the adaptation of the solution, but such adaptations are limited in nature. This study also identifies the agents who stimulate stakeholder inclusion as being mainly academic researchers and researchers linked to multi-institutional projects. Our findings indicate that innovation management thinking is rarely applied in the governance of research and innovation projects ‘born’ in academia. We suggest enhancing RRI theoretical development by incorporating elements of innovation management such as early inclusion of users in the innovation process. For practitioners, this means an extension of the design space to allow early stakeholder inclusion in the innovation process to ensure responsible outcomes. We also identified avenues for future research. There is a need to systematically investigate which tools and frameworks for deliberate stakeholder inclusion are relevant at the various stages of the innovation and development process.

Highlights

  • Seeking to transform the world, United Nations has developed 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), that is, “a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity” [1]

  • This is important in view of global grand challenges and Sustainable Development Goals since stakeholders are central to the achievement of responsible outcomes

  • Our meta-synthesis revealed that stakeholder inclusion is debated in different yet related literature steams—research and innovation (RRI) discourse as well as innovation management discourse

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seeking to transform the world, United Nations has developed 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), that is, “a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity” [1]. Responsible research and innovation (RRI) is suggested as a method to govern innovation development to address challenges such as poverty, inequality, aging population and availability of quality healthcare [5,6]. Such principles suggest broader stakeholder inclusion in the decision-making process, anticipation of societal needs, and reflection of concerns [7], which calls for new innovation policies [8]. RRI can become a means for highlighting multi-stakeholder partnerships to “mobilize and share knowledge, expertise, technology and financial resources” (p. [1]) and at the same time to “encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships” (p. [1])

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.