Abstract

IntroductionThe number of heart transplants in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) is increasing, though outcomes remain unfavorable compared to those without CHD. The etiology of this mortality difference remains uncertain. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) is a predictor of survival post-transplantation, and adult CHD patients have been observed to have higher PRA levels. Here we assessed the relationship between PRA and outcomes in adult patients with CHD who underwent heart transplantation. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the 2004–2015 ISHLT Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry to investigate the role of sensitization in the observed excess mortality. The composite outcome of mortality or graft failure within 1-year of transplantation was compared among CHD vs. non-CHD recipients, according to sensitization as measured by pre-transplant panel reactive antibodies (PRA). ResultsAdults with CHD (n = 1188) had higher PRA level compared to non-CHD (n = 38,201) recipients (27% vs. 18% PRA>10%, respectively, p < 0.001). CHD diagnosis remained independently associated with a higher incidence of the composite outcome in multivariable analysis after adjusting for PRA and other variables. Further, even after age-matching, patients with CHD and PRA ≤10% were at higher risk of the primary outcome compared to non-CHD (OR 2.1 [1.4–3.4], p = 0.001), though both groups had comparable outcomes when PRA was >10% (OR 1.1 [0.6–2.0], p = 0.852). ConclusionsAdults with CHD are more likely to have higher sensitization and worse outcomes than non-CHD recipients. Higher sensitization rates alone do not fully explain their excess risk of adverse outcomes after heart transplantation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.