Abstract
HE knowledge base acquired during medical school and specialty training needs to be refreshed and updated to meet the rapidly changing needs of an evolving practice. For several years now, continuing medical education (CME) has been a more visible component of the professional life of anesthesiologists, because the activity has become mandatory. Although there are many ways to earn CME credits, most medical practitioners comply with CME requirements primarily through attendance at scientific meetings or refresher courses. At such venues, the material presented must be based on the best available evidence, and this evidence is normally found in the medical literature. Journals are readily available, and reading them has always been a way to keep abreast of new discoveries. Since the basic information is in journals to start with, why not use them as a primary source of CME? A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific meetings and medical journals as source of CME material is helpful in defining the usefulness of both, and the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.