Abstract

By examining the role research has played in eradication or regional elimination initiatives for three viral diseases--smallpox, poliomyelitis, and measles--we derive nine cross-cutting lessons applicable to malaria eradication. In these initiatives, some types of research commenced as the programs began and proceeded in parallel. Basic laboratory, clinical, and field research all contributed notably to progress made in the viral programs. For each program, vaccine was the lynchpin intervention, but as the programs progressed, research was required to improve vaccine formulations, delivery methods, and immunization schedules. Surveillance was fundamental to all three programs, whilst polio eradication also required improved diagnostic methods to identify asymptomatic infections. Molecular characterization of pathogen isolates strengthened surveillance and allowed insights into the geographic source of infections and their spread. Anthropologic, sociologic, and behavioural research were needed to address cultural and religious beliefs to expand community acceptance. The last phases of elimination and eradication became increasingly difficult, as a nil incidence was approached. Any eradication initiative for malaria must incorporate flexible research agendas that can adapt to changing epidemiologic contingencies and allow planning for posteradication scenarios.

Highlights

  • Despite a previous global eradication campaign (1955–1969), malaria continues to be a major public health problem

  • Lessons were learned that are applicable to the Malaria Eradication Program and that should, we believe, be incorporated in the Malaria Eradication Research Agenda described in this Supplement

  • Nine cross cutting lessons have been provided by these three vaccine-dependent eradication and elimination programs of viral diseases in which research was integral to guide program activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite a previous global eradication campaign (1955–1969), malaria continues to be a major public health problem. We describe three viral disease elimination/eradication efforts whose research agendas offer lessons for malaria scientists and public health program managers. From these experiences, lessons were learned that are applicable to the Malaria Eradication Program and that should, we believe, be incorporated in the Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) described in this Supplement. 1% (many subclinical and nonparalytic cases) High for paralytic disease; low for nonparalytic disease 3

Often low
Field research
Smallpox The magnitude of the smallpox problem was largely unknown in
Concluding Comments
Findings
Author Contributions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.