Abstract
BackgroundManagement decisions are not straightforward when the Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (USFNA) demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category III or IV, and a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy or a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA) could be performed. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of r-USFNA in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules by evaluating the likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of all patients with thyroid nodules between 2011 and 2015 at the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Canada). Three hundred fifty-one patients who had undergone a surgical procedure (hemi or total thyroidectomy) and a diagnosis of B3 or B4 on the primary USFNA (p-USFNA) were included in the study. Ninety-six of the included patients also had a repeat USFNA prior to the surgery. Demographic data, type of procedure, and McGill Thyroid Nodule Score (MTNS) were obtained from the medical records. Malignancy rates were calculated based on the final surgical histopathology report.ResultsUpon r-USFNA, an average 76 % of patients did not change Bethesda categories, 7.4 % downgraded to a benign category. The results showed that, on an average 17.3 % of patients with p-USFNA of B3 and 20 % of patients with p-USFNA of B4, upgraded to a malignant or suspicious for malignancy category, thus changing the clinical management to total thyroidectomy. Our data demonstrates that r-USFNA facilitates choosing the correct surgery of total thyroidectomy in about 20 % of nodules that have upgraded from B3/B4 to a more definite malignant category.Conclusionsr-USFNA in patients with indeterminate diagnoses (B3 or B4) increases categorization into more definite categories. Approximately 20 % of patients are found to have malignant thyroid nodules and suspicious for malignancy thyroid nodules upon repeating the biopsy, hence a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy was avoided and a more definitive surgery could be performed. Furthermore, repeat USFNA results in a fewer number of hemi-thyroidectomy and completion thyroidectomy procedures.
Highlights
Management decisions are not straightforward when the Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (USFNA) demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category Bethesda score IV (B4) Bethesda score B5 Bethesda score V (IV) (III) or IV, and a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy or a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA) could be performed
If the r-USFNA results in Bethesda Bethesda score III (B3) Bethesda score III (II) (B2), Bethesda V (B5) or Bethesda VI (B6), management recommendations are more clear and the test is deemed to be useful
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of repeat USFNA in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (B3 and B4) by evaluating the likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis
Summary
Management decisions are not straightforward when the Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (USFNA) demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category III or IV, and a diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy or a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA) could be performed. Management decisions are not straightforward when the USFNA demonstrates a Bethesda score of either category III (B3) or IV (B4) [2,3,4,5,6] In those instances, it is not uncommon for some patients to undergo diagnostic hemi-thyroidectomy to obtain a definitive diagnosis, while others prefer a more conservative approach and opt for a repeat USFNA (r-USFNA). The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of repeat USFNA in the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (B3 and B4) by evaluating the likelihood of obtaining a definite diagnosis This investigation assesses the usefulness of r-USFNA in the prevention of completion hemi-thyroidectomies in patients with initial B3 or B4 diagnoses
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
