Abstract

In each of two experiments, subjects were given 48 Brown-Peterson trials, using word lists as stimuli, followed by an unexpected final free recall test on the words. Of interest was the influence on final performance of (1) the length of the original Brown-Peterson retention interval and (2) whether the subject overtly rehearsed the word list or performed a rehearsal-preventing task during the Brown-Peterson retention interval. To avoid confoundings involving the influence of initial recall on final recall, initial recall was required on only half the trials and analysis of final performance was restricted to data from the other half of the trials (referred to as no-recall trials). Results were consistent over the experiments: Items rehearsed during the Brown-Peterson retention interval showed better delayed recall than did items for which rehearsal was prevented. Also, delayed performance increased monotonically with retention interval for items that the subject had rehearsed but remained fairly constant over retention interval for items whose presentation was followed by a rehearsal-preventing task. It is argued that earlier studies indicating that overt repetition will not increase performance on a delayed test have failed to consider that overt repetition is a nonunitary phenomenon which may show either maintenance or elaborative properties in different situations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.