Abstract

A full-sine (biphasic) pulse waveform is most commonly used for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but little is known about how variations in duration or amplitude of distinct pulse segments influence the effectiveness of a single TMS pulse to elicit a corticomotor response. Using a novel TMS device, we systematically varied the configuration of full-sine pulses to assess the impact of configuration changes on resting motor threshold (RMT) as measure of stimulation effectiveness with single-pulse TMS of the non-dominant motor hand area (M1). In young healthy volunteers, we (i) compared monophasic, half-sine, and full-sine pulses, (ii) applied two-segment pulses consisting of two identical half-sines, and (iii) manipulated amplitude, duration, and current direction of the first or second full-sine pulse half-segments. RMT was significantly higher using half-sine or monophasic pulses compared with full-sine. Pulses combining two half-sines of identical polarity and duration were also characterized by higher RMT than full-sine stimuli resulting. For full-sine stimuli, decreasing the amplitude of the half-segment inducing posterior-anterior oriented current in M1 resulted in considerably higher RMT, whereas varying the amplitude of the half-segment inducing anterior-posterior current had a smaller effect. These findings provide direct experimental evidence that the pulse segment inducing a posterior-anterior directed current in M1 contributes most to corticospinal pathway excitation. Preferential excitation of neuronal target cells in the posterior-anterior segment or targeting of different neuronal structures by the two half-segments can explain this result. Thus, our findings help understanding the mechanisms of neural stimulation by full-sine TMS.

Highlights

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is commonly used to non-invasively probe and alter human motor cortex excitability via a time-varying magnetic field [1]

  • Half-sine, full-sine, and monophasic pulse waveforms differed with respect to resting motor threshold (RMT) (rmANOVA factor WAVEFORM: F(2;18)561.07, P,0.0001; Fig. 3B)

  • Post-hoc testing revealed that RMT was significantly lower with full-sine TMS pulses than with half-sine (P,0.0001, Student’s paired t test) or monophasic pulses (P,0.0001, Student’s paired t test)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is commonly used to non-invasively probe and alter human motor cortex excitability via a time-varying magnetic field [1]. A magnetic stimulator consists of a capacitor that is linked via a power-switch to a stimulation coil consisting of, for instance, multiple wound copper wires. This design leads to a serial resonant circuit with a sinusoidal highfrequency current flow through the stimulation coil as long as the power-switch is closed. Because of the low energy efficacy, a monophasic waveform is mainly used to probe cortical excitability with single or paired pulses [3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call