Abstract

Over two-thirds of a century ago, Hodgkin and Huxley proposed the existence of voltage gated ion channels (VGICs) to carry Na+ and K+ ions across the cell membrane to create the nerve impulse, in response to depolarization of the membrane. The channels have multiple physiological roles, and play a central role in a wide variety of diseases when they malfunction. The first channel structure was found by MacKinnon and coworkers in 1998. Subsequently, the structure of a number of VGICs was determined in the open (ion conducting) state. This type of channel consists of four voltage sensing domains (VSDs), each formed from four transmembrane (TM) segments, plus a pore domain through which ions move. Understanding the gating mechanism (how the channel opens and closes) requires structures. One TM segment (S4) has an arginine in every third position, with one such segment per domain. It is usually assumed that these arginines are all ionized, and in the resting state are held toward the intracellular side of the membrane by voltage across the membrane. They are assumed to move outward (extracellular direction) when released by depolarization of this voltage, producing a capacitive gating current and opening the channel. We suggest alternate interpretations of the evidence that led to these models. Measured gating current is the total charge displacement of all atoms in the VSD; we propose that the prime, but not sole, contributor is proton motion, not displacement of the charges on the arginines of S4. It is known that the VSD can conduct protons. Quantum calculations on the Kv1.2 potassium channel VSD show how; the key is the amphoteric nature of the arginine side chain, which allows it to transfer a proton. This appears to be the first time the arginine side chain has had its amphoteric character considered. We have calculated one such proton transfer in detail: this proton starts from a tyrosine that can ionize, transferring to the NE of the third arginine on S4; that arginine’s NH then transfers a proton to a glutamate. The backbone remains static. A mutation predicted to affect the proton transfer has been qualitatively confirmed experimentally, from the change in the gating current-voltage curve. The total charge displacement in going from a normal closed potential of −70 mV across the membrane to 0 mV (open), is calculated to be approximately consistent with measured values, although the error limits on the calculation require caution in interpretation.

Highlights

  • Hodgkin and Huxley [1,2,3,4] proposed that the nerve impulse consisted of the transport of Na+and K+ across the nerve cell membrane, through protein channels that opened and closed in response to polarization or depolarization of the membrane voltage

  • The net result was that the energy for the closed (−70 mV) state is lower with arginine, glutamate, and tyrosine all neutral, while the open state has a proton transferred from tyrosine to arginine

  • There is a standard model in which gating current is provided by the motion perpendicular to the membrane of the S4 TM segment of the voltage sensing domains (VSDs), supported principally by: (a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hodgkin and Huxley [1,2,3,4] proposed that the nerve impulse consisted of the transport of Na+. The evidence that gave rise to the standard models in which positively charged S4 moves to produce gating current can be reinterpreted so as to be consistent with proton motion. Are multiple [41]; basedwas on mutation theymechanism concluded that gating currentThere was produced by astates through which the channel its way to are opening [21]; essentially all models require multiple different mechanism frompasses that ofon. We have offered an alternative, proton transport, which would provide the gating current, and would be able to open and close the gate [43,44,45,46,47,48], but must show that the evidence that has been interpreted in terms of the standard model can be interpreted without it Than by the standard model? We have offered an alternative, proton transport, which would provide the gating current, and would be able to open and close the gate [43,44,45,46,47,48], but must show that the evidence that has been interpreted in terms of the standard model can be interpreted without it

Evidence that Can Be Interpreted without Invoking S4 Motion
Temperature Dependence of Gating
Proton Delocalization and a Transition Threshold
Computational Techniques
Some Interesting Things That Water Does
Four views
Pressure
10.1. Choice of System for Quantum Calculations
10.2. Results
11. Gating Model from the Computation
11. Gating
13. Summary on VSD Calculation
14. Specific Computational Methods
15. Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.