Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of primary closure versus patch angioplasty on the incidence of early recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy in the hands of a single surgeon, and to analyze the risk factors associated with early recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. A retrospective review was performed of 178 consecutive patients who underwent 200 carotid endarterectomies-100 done consecutively with primary closure and 100 done consecutively with patch angioplasty. Of these patients, 126 qualified for analysis by having had at least 18 months of follow-up by serial duplex scanning. Of this group, the first 65 patients underwent 75 routine primary closures, while the last 61 underwent 67 routine patch angioplasties. All patients underwent a completion angiogram at the end of the case. Recurrent stenosis was defined as luminal diameter narrowing >60% on duplex scan. A multifactorial analysis was performed to analyze the effect of age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, and contralateral stenosis on recurrent stenosis. The results of this study showed that in a single surgeon's experience with carotid endarterectomy, varying only the method of closure between primary closure versus patch angioplasty, there is no statistically significant difference in the rate of early restenosis. No difference was noted in the perioperative morbidity and mortality between groups.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.