Abstract

An individual's voice is determined in part by the limitations of their anatomy and physiology, in addition to language-specific phonological and phonetic structure. When a bilingual switches between languages, how much do they change their voice? Previous work using a corpus of spontaneous speech from early Cantonese-English bilinguals found surprisingly little variability across individuals' languages [Johnson et al., Proc. of Interspeech (2020)] compared to earlier research on across-talker acoustic voice variability [Lee et al., JASA (2019)]. A crucial difference between these two studies, however, is passage length. A longer passage (e.g., 30 min) potentially allows for a more stable structure to emerge in a principal components analysis, while a shorter sample (e.g., 2 min or less) may instead be subject to ephemeral variation, and potentially misrepresent the overall variability of a voice. Building on Johnson et al. (2020), the present study asks: to what extent does passage length impact the results of principal components and canonical redundancy analyses designed to elucidate within-talker (across languages) and across-talker (within language) idiosyncratic variation? These results are important for theories of talker recognition, identification, and discrimination, in addition to improving understanding of talker-specific acoustic-phonetic variation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call