Abstract

Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer often have a poor performance status, which is considered a relative contraindication to cytotoxic chemotherapy. We investigated outcomes in hospitalized solid tumour oncology patients who received palliative chemotherapy (pct). With ethics approval, we performed a single-institution chart review of all patients hospitalized on our oncology unit who received pct between April 2008 and January 2010. Patient demographics, reasons for admission, cancer type, prior therapy, and administered chemotherapy were recorded. The primary endpoint was median survival from date of inpatient chemotherapy until death or last known follow up. We also investigated place of discharge and whether patients received additional therapy. During the study period, 199 inpatients received pct. Median age was 61 years; 59% of the patients were women. Most had been admitted with dyspnea (31%) or pain (29%) as the dominant symptom. Common cancers represented were breast (23%), small-cell lung cancer (sclc, 22%), non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc, 16%), and colorectal cancer (9%). Most patients (67%) were receiving first-line chemotherapy. Median overall survival duration was 4.5 months, and the 6-month survival rate was 41%. The longest and shortest survivals were seen in the sclc and nsclc groups (7.3 and 2.5 months respectively). Factors significantly associated with shorter survival were baseline hypoalbuminemia and therapy beyond the first line. In this cohort, 77% of patients were discharged home, and 72% received further chemotherapy. Despite a short median survival, many patients are well enough to be discharged home and to receive further chemotherapy. The development of risk models to predict a higher chance of efficacy will have practical clinical utility.

Highlights

  • The life expectancy of patients with advanced cancer is often short, despite continuing improvements in treatment options for many common malignancies such as breast, lung, and colorectal cancer[1–3]

  • The evidence to support pct in hospitalized patients is scarce. Whether such care has positive effects on survival or quality of life is questionable and merits additional investigation. While recognizing that this measure is subjective, we hypothesized that pct given to patients admitted to hospital for symptoms of advanced cancer would not result in meaningful clinical benefit

  • We hypothesized that pct given to patients admitted to hospital for symptoms of advanced cancer would not result in meaningful clinical benefit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The life expectancy of patients with advanced cancer is often short, despite continuing improvements in treatment options for many common malignancies such as breast, lung, and colorectal cancer[1–3]. Decisions about whether patients will accept palliative chemotherapy (pct) are complex and can vary widely depending on who is being asked to decide[4,5]. Guiding decisions and advice in this setting are a number of prognostic factors that can predict the degree of benefit from pct. Multiple studies have demonstrated that significant clinical benefit (measured by longer survival or improved quality of life) are most commonly seen in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) ps scores of 0 and 1 (patients that remain relatively asymptomatic and independently functioning). Most patients with a ps of 3 or 4 are WHEATLEY–PRICE et al. Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer often have a poor performance status, which is considered a relative contraindication to cytotoxic chemotherapy. We investigated outcomes in hospitalized solid tumour oncology patients who received palliative chemotherapy (pct)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.