Abstract
The role of open access in reducing waste in medical research.
Highlights
Twenty years ago an editorial by Doug Altman in the BMJ [1], ‘‘The Scandal of Poor Medical Research’’, decried the poor design and reporting of research, stating that ‘‘huge sums of money are spent annually on research that is seriously flawed through the use of inappropriate designs, unrepresentative samples, small samples, incorrect methods of analysis, and faulty interpretation’’
Much waste clearly occurs after publication: from poor access, poor dissemination, and poor uptake of the findings of research
Open access will not in itself fix the problems of poor research question selection, poor study design, selective non-publication, or poor or biased reporting, but these can be ameliorated considerably through appropriate editorial policies and peer review processes
Summary
Twenty years ago an editorial by Doug Altman in the BMJ [1], ‘‘The Scandal of Poor Medical Research’’, decried the poor design and reporting of research, stating that ‘‘huge sums of money are spent annually on research that is seriously flawed through the use of inappropriate designs, unrepresentative samples, small samples, incorrect methods of analysis, and faulty interpretation’’. The estimate that 85% of research is wasted referred only to activities prior to the point of publication. Much waste clearly occurs after publication: from poor access, poor dissemination, and poor uptake of the findings of research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.