Abstract

The purpose of this scoping review was to outline the extent of available literature including the prevalence of video quality appraisal tools, characterize how online videos were used, and identify the gaps in the literature with implications for future research. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Six databases were searched: (1) MEDLINE (Ovid), (2) EMBASE, (3) Cochrane, (4) ERIC, (5) CINAHL PLUS, and (6) Google Scholar for Medical Subject Headings terms online videos, postgraduate health education, and health professional/s. A total of 6948 articles were identified, of which 78 were included in the review. The articles included were primarily either experimental or observational studies, with most being from North America. Twelve concepts were identified: (1) procedural skills teaching; (2) video assessment; (3) validation of an assessment tool; (4) video feedback; (5) coaching; (6) broadcasting; (7) learner characteristics; (8) video characteristics; (9) video quality; (10) a quality assessment tool; (11) platforms and video library; and (12) health information governance. While there is a diverse and growing body of literature on this area, information is lacking about the quality appraisal of online videos.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call