Abstract
Abstract Background Niacin remains a therapeutic option for patients with cardiovascular disease, but recent studies have called into question the effectiveness of other HDL-C-raising drugs. We evaluated the evidence supporting current FDA-approved uses of niacin in cardiovascular prevention settings. Methods The systematic review included clinical trials involving niacin as a treatment for cardiovascular disease. The meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials reporting niacin’s effect on at least one long-term outcome: cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease mortality, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, revascularization, major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Databases were searched up to October 2017. Study-level data were extracted and inverse-variance weighted methods were used to produce pooled risk ratios using random-effects models for between-study heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the association between change in HDL-C and the log risk ratio of the pooled results. Results Out of 119 clinical trials, 17 documented niacin’s effect on at least one cardiovascular disease outcome. The meta-analysis covered 35,760 patients with history of cardiovascular disease or dyslipidemia. Cumulative evidence found no preventive effect of niacin on cardiovascular outcomes in secondary prevention. Stratified meta-analysis showed an association between niacin monotherapy and reduction of some cardiovascular events (acute coronary events, RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.58-0.96; stroke, RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.59-0.94; revascularization, RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.37-0.72). These results were mainly driven by two trials conducted in the 1970s and 1980s. Conclusions Niacin might have some use in lipid control for secondary prevention as monotherapy, perhaps in patients intolerant to statins, but evidence is from older studies on a population potentially not representative of current-day patients. Key messages Niacin might have some use for cardiovascular secondary prevention in patients intolerant to statins, but evidence is from older studies on a population not representative of current-day patients. The FDA has to review the approved indications for Niacin in cardiovascular secondary prevention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.