Abstract
This Methods training manual and tools for in-depth field research sets out the rationale and method for CIFOR’s research on multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs). It was specifically designed to examine MSFs set up to address land use and land-use change at the subnational level in Brazil, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and Peru. This manual should be read in tandem with the project’s Framing literature review for in-depth field research.MSFs are purposely organized interactive processes that bring together a range of stakeholders to participate in dialogue, decision-making and/or implementation regarding actions seeking to address a problem they hold in common, or to achieve a goal for their common benefit. The growth of MSFs related to land use/land-use change reflects the awareness that environmental problems cannot be addressed without the effective engagement of the actors that determine land-use practices on the ground; nor can such problems be resolved within a conservation community when the drivers are located in other sectors. MSFs may produce more effective and sustainable outcomes by getting sectors and actors that have commonly held contradictory development priorities to coordinate and align goals through discussion, negotiation and planning. Nevertheless, MSFs may also be an expedient way to implement top-down approaches and create the illusion of participation. Scholars and activists note that ‘MSF’ may reify top-down approaches, and take the ‘participation’ of local stakeholders for granted in box-ticking exercises to please donors. This research is timely because MSFs have received renewed attention from policy makers and development and conservation practitioners, in light of the growing perception of urgency to address climate change and transform development trajectories. The comparative project aims to contribute empirically to the study of MSFs and similar participatory processes. We hope others will find this manual useful for designing similar research initiatives.The results from each site are found at the links below: Brazil: Acre (English); Mato Grosso (English); Para (English/Portuguese) Ethiopia: Oromia (Bale English / Jamma-Urji English) Indonesia: Central Kalimantan (English/Indonesian); East Kalimantan (English/Indonesian); Jambi (English/Indonesian); West Java (English/Indonesian) Peru: Loreto (English/Spanish); Madre de Dios (English/Spanish); San Martin (English/Spanish); Ucayali (English/Spanish)
Highlights
What?Through a comparative study spanning 14 case studies in 4 countries (Brazil – 4 case studies, Ethiopia – 2, Indonesia – 4 and Peru – 4), we will examine the equity and effectiveness of the processes and outcomes of multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) set up around land use and land-use change (LULUC)
Your first step will be to check the relevant report and its database to get a general idea of the actors you will soon be engaging with. For those of you working in a Governor’s Climate and Forest (GCF) Task Force member region, the stakeholder maps on http://network.gcftaskforce.org/ will be of great help
Remember that at this point you are interested in more than just MSF participants, as you will be trying to map out all relevant land use and land-use change stakeholders in the area where you are carrying out your research
Summary
Through a comparative study spanning 14 case studies in 4 countries (Brazil – 4 case studies, Ethiopia – 2, Indonesia – 4 and Peru – 4), we will examine the equity and effectiveness of the processes and outcomes of multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) set up around land use and land-use change (LULUC). Multi-stakeholder forums are purposely organized interactive processes that bring together a range of stakeholders to participate in dialog and/or decision making and/or implementation of actions seeking to address a problem they hold in common or achieve a goal for their common benefit. For the purposes of our research, we are interested in organizations rather than individuals. Examples of these include indigenous communities, grassroots organizations, forestry companies, eco-tourism firms, subregional governments, donor governments, and research institutions
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
