Abstract

The study aimed to find out whether the imagery ability within the two subcomponents of motor imagery (visual and kinesthetic) allows predicting the results in simple response time task and eye–hand coordination task in a group of young male soccer players (9–15 years old). Non-specific simple response time and eye–hand coordination play a key role in predicting specific sports performance level. Participants performed Reaction Time Task, Eye–Hand Coordination Task, and completed Motor Imagery Questionnaire–Revised. Data were submitted to the structural equations analysis based on the maximum likelihood method in order to estimate a structural model of relationship between variables. Results indicate visual rather than kinesthetic motor imagery is associated with non-specific motor skills. Higher scores on the visual motor imagery scale were observed to correlate with faster reaction times and better coordination in the study group. This supports the idea that during learning a new perceptual-motor-task the visual control is required. Results provide the evidence for the specific role of the third-person perspective imagery in young athletes playing soccer.

Highlights

  • Motor imagery (MI) is defined as the mental simulation of a movement without any real action [1]

  • MI may be subdivided into visual motor imagery (VMI) and kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI)

  • The visual motor imagery was negatively and significantly related to reaction time (β = −0.31, p = 0.015, and 95%CI: −0.56 −0.08)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motor imagery (MI) is defined as the mental simulation of a movement without any real action [1]. Studies investigating groups of elite, world-class athletes have found that rates of imagery use range from 70% to 99% and that MI is used by approximately 94% of sports coaches [6,7]. Motor imagery training can affect motor behavior, like muscle strength [10,11]. MI may be subdivided into visual motor imagery (VMI) and kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI). Some studies have shown that these two types of imagery have different effects on performance in sport. Visual motor imagery is more effective if the participant has to focus precisely on the target, like in darts [14] or beach volleyball [15]. People often combine KMI and VMI and the interoceptive and

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.