Abstract

Sting jets (SJs) occur as an additional region of low‐level strong winds in some Shapiro–Keyser‐type extratropical cyclones. While SJs are widely accepted as being distinct from the warm and cold conveyor belts, the mechanisms responsible for their occurrence are still not fully understood. Here we determine the relative importance of the release of mesoscale instabilities and synoptic‐scale cyclone dynamics, so addressing an area of current debate. Numerical weather prediction simulations of a SJ‐containing windstorm are analysed and Lagrangian trajectories used to assess the evolution of, and mesoscale atmospheric instabilities (e.g. symmetric and inertial instabilities) in, the descending airstream. The SJ undergoes a two‐stage descent: cooling via sublimation followed by a large acceleration accompanied by instability release. Combined tilting and stretching of vorticity play a major role in the local onset of instability on the airstream. Vorticity and frontogenesis fields have a narrow slantwise banded structure in the cloud head and around the SJ; the descending SJ modifies the widespread frontolysis expected from the large‐scale dynamics alone in the frontal‐fracture region. A coarser‐resolution simulation also generates strong winds in the frontal‐fracture region, although these are significantly weaker than in the higher‐resolution simulation. The SJ airstream in the coarser‐resolution simulation undergoes a weaker descent without instability generation and descends in a widespread frontolytic region. Hence, while the SJ undergoes a process of destabilisation that enhances its descent and acceleration in the higher‐resolution simulation, enhancing the strong winds already generated by the synoptic‐scale cyclone dynamics, this destabilisation does not occur in the SJ produced by a coarser‐resolution simulation, resulting in weaker winds. This analysis reveals the synergy between the paradigms of SJ occurrence through the release of mesoscale instabilities and synoptic‐scale cyclone dynamics and demonstrates that the current debate may in part be a consequence of the model resolutions used by different studies.

Highlights

  • The term “Sting Jet” (SJ) has gained rapid acceptance in the meteorological literature and by the media since it was first used by Browning (2004) to describe an observed mesoscale region of extremely strong surface winds distinct from the winds associated with the warm conveyor belt (WCB) and cold conveyor belt (CCB) in the extratropical cyclone that devastated southeast England on October 16, 1987

  • The wind maximum in the frontal-fracture region is broader in the coarser-resolution simulation, less focused and definitely weaker, with speed reaching only 48 m/s compared to 60 m/s in the higher-resolution simulation

  • Note that the second band of cloud in the 12 km simulation which wraps around the cyclone centre outside the CCB is entirely absent from the lower-resolution simulation (Figure 12a,b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term “Sting Jet” (SJ) has gained rapid acceptance in the meteorological literature and by the media since it was first used by Browning (2004) to describe an observed mesoscale region of extremely strong surface winds distinct from the winds associated with the warm conveyor belt (WCB) and cold conveyor belt (CCB) in the extratropical cyclone that devastated southeast England on October 16, 1987. Tini was arguably the most severe of all those intense cyclones, with the analysed surface pressure minimum dropping 40 hPa in 18 hr between 1200 UTC on February 11, and 0600 UTC on February 12. This deepening rate is more than twice the 24 hPa (24 hr)−1 threshold (at 60◦N) used to define “extratropical bombs” (Sanders and Gyakum, 1980). Similar banded structures at the cloud-head tip have been observed in SJ storms and linked to the multiple slantwise circulations associated with the release of CSI or similar mesoscale instabilities in the region (Browning and Field, 2004; Parton et al, 2009).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call