Abstract

This research sees that every community has local wisdom which is a source of social capital that can be accessed and utilized by its members. In this case, the community by itself builds their own social capital, with relationships built between communities through the local wisdom. The traditional remote community, certainly not separated from potential conflicts, but they can always overcome the potential conflicts that exist between them, because the role of local wisdom as a strong social capital among them. The theory used on this research is social capital Putnam and conducted in Buhu Village, Tibawa District, Gorontalo County, Indonesia. This research utilized case study as qualitative approach. Data collecting used in-depth interview, observation and documentation. Data were collected from six informants by using snowball sampling technique. This research found that the element of solidarity is important in building a strong social capital in the traditional remove community. This is different from Putnam which only emphasizes three elements, beliefs, networks and norms. In addition, the researchers found that in the process of networking, the traditional remote community is not only dealing with people they know, they are also different with Putnam as to realize various things, often people ask for help from their friends, family or trusted acquaintance (Field, 2010, hal. 3). The ‘huyula’ local wisdom that builds the social capital in the traditional remote community is able to bridge the differences that exist in a community, and can overcome the potential conflicts in the traditional remote community.

Highlights

  • Indonesia is a country with a diverse population consisting of various ethnic groups

  • Wiranto et al (2014) said that the diversity and plurality of the tribes living in the interior had enriched the culture of the Indonesian nation and was an extraordinary potential for national security

  • The characteristics of the community in general, especially the people included in the "Remote Indigenous Communities" have similar characteristics and characteristics, among others: first, they live and grow in areas that are difficult to reach,second, the level of life/economic welfare is still very low; and third, lagging behind various aspects of life and the progress of society today that have been in touch with developments in a region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Indonesia is a country with a diverse population consisting of various ethnic groups. Wiranto et al (2014) said that the diversity and plurality of the tribes living in the interior had enriched the culture of the Indonesian nation and was an extraordinary potential for national security. If this ethnic and cultural diversity are not managed wisely, it will be the seed of division between the tribes. The existence of certain tribes or communities that are relatively left behind, isolated and remote is known as the Remote Indigenous Community. This term is a response to the criticism of the use of the term "alienated" community. The characteristics of the community in general, especially the people included in the "Remote Indigenous Communities" have similar characteristics and characteristics, among others: first, they live and grow in areas that are difficult to reach (remote, scattered, and mobile),second, the level of life/economic welfare is still very low; and third, lagging behind various aspects of life and the progress of society today that have been in touch with developments in a region

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call