Abstract

The variation in animal coloration patterns has evolved in response to different visual strategies for reducing the risk of predation. However, the perception of animal coloration by enemies is affected by a variety of factors, including morphology and habitat. We use the diversity of Australian chrysomeline leaf beetles to explore relationships of visual ecology to beetle morphology and colour patterns. There is impressive colour pattern variation within the Chrysomelinae, which is likely to reflect anti-predatory strategies. Our phylogenetic comparative analyses reveal strong selection for beetles to be less distinct from their host plants, suggesting that the beetle colour patterns have a camouflage effect, rather than the widely assumed aposematic function. Beetles in dark habitats were significantly larger than beetles in bright habitats, potentially to avoid detection by predators because it is harder for large animals to be cryptic in bright habitats. Polyphagous species have greater colour contrast against their host plants than monophagous species, highlighting the conflict between a generalist foraging strategy and the detection costs of potential predators. Host plant taxa – Eucalyptus and Acacia – interacted differently with beetle shape to predict blue pattern differences between beetle and host plant, possibly an outcome of different predator complexes on these host plants. The variety of anti-predator strategies in chrysomelines may explain their successful radiation into a variety of habitats and, ultimately, their speciation.

Highlights

  • The pervasive risk of attack by natural enemies has favored the evolution of a variety of anti-predator strategies (Stevens, 2013)

  • Principal Component 1 (PC1) values of sister taxa are generally similar (Figure 4A), and a similar trend is seen for principal component 2 (PC2) values (Figure 4B)

  • Our results reveal considerable variation in the color pattern difference—quantitative measures of the difference of both color and pattern—between Australian chrysomeline beetles and their host plants, and that this variation is predicted by the host plant specificity of the beetles and their light environment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pervasive risk of attack by natural enemies has favored the evolution of a variety of anti-predator strategies (Stevens, 2013). Protective color patterns are arguably among the most widespread of these strategies, as they can reduce prey detection and/or warn predators that the prey is unpalatable (Cott, 1940; Ruxton et al, 2004; Stevens, 2007). Conspicuous color patterns are used to advertise the distastefulness of an organism to visually searching enemies (Roper, 1990; Prudic et al, 2007b; Skelhorn et al, 2016). These functions of color patterns may not be mutually exclusive, as some color patterns may combine warning coloration at a close range, with. While the adaptive significance of these color patterns are reasonably well documented, how their evolution has been shaped by ecological (Prudic et al, 2007a; Mappes et al, 2014) and life history factors (Ojala et al, 2007; Tan et al, 2016) is less clearly understood

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call