The role of LENT and PROMISE scores in predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion.

Abstract

Background:Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a condition, that can be seen in 15% of patients diagnosed with cancer. Because of the short overall survival, it is important to identify the appropriate treatment. In addition to the palliation of secondary symptoms due to MPE, it should also be decided in which cases a more aggressive treatment is to be followed. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of LENT and clinical PROMISE scores in predicting survival in patients with MPEMethods:Age, sex, smoking history, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, cancer type, history of chemotherapy/radiotherapy, laboratory values, and pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase were recorded. The LENT and the PROMISE scores were calculated and risk categories were determined. During the follow-up, blood tests and tomography controls were performed on the patients as routine. The overall survival was calculated as the period from the date of diagnosis of MPE to death or until December 31, 2019Results:A total of 169 patients were included. The median age was 65 (26–86). In the single-variable analysis, there was a significant increase in mortality risk in the poor performance score and if the LENT risk group progressed from the low-to medium-/high-risk group or PROMISE categories A to B, A to C or A to D. In multivariate analysis, mortality risk in 1, 3, 6, and 12 months increased significantly in poor performance score, in PROMISE category B, C, and D. In high LENT risk-group, an increased mortality risk was shown in only 12 months of survivalConclusions:Our data show that poor performance score (ECOG 3-4), PROMISE category B, C, and D significantly increase mortality risk and the LENT score is inadequate in predicting survival.