Abstract
This article aims to identify the beginning of the emergence of the concept of acts of sovereignty in France and how this affected the judicial theory created by the French Council of State, and its reflection on Egyptian laws and decisions of the Supreme Constitutional Court as well as the Supreme Administrative Court in Egypt. This article also aims to extract the criteria decided by the judiciary to understand the concept of sovereignty and how to distinguish it from other acts of administration. To achieve these goals, the author used the analytical approach to analyze judicial rulings that dealt with the actions of sovereignty, and the comparative perspective was also relied upon to determine the dimensions of the theory of actions of sovereignty in France and its impact on the idea of acts of sovereignty in Egypt.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
