The Role of Internal vs External Hydrogen on Fracture Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steels

Abstract

Abstract Austenitic stainless steels are used in high-pressure hydrogen containment infrastructure for their resistance to hydrogen embrittlement. Applications for the use of austenitic stainless steels include pressure vessels, tubing, piping, valves, fittings and other piping components. Despite their resistance to brittle behavior in the presence of hydrogen, austenitic stainless steels can exhibit degraded fracture performance. The mechanisms of hydrogen-assisted fracture, however, remain elusive, which has motivated continued research on these alloys. There are two principal approaches to evaluate the influence of gaseous hydrogen on mechanical properties: internal and external hydrogen, respectively. The austenite phase has high solubility and low diffusivity of hydrogen at room temperature, which enables introduction of hydrogen into the material through thermal precharging at elevated temperature and pressure; a condition referred to as internal hydrogen. H-precharged material can subsequently be tested in ambient conditions. Alternatively, mechanical testing can be performed while test coupons are immersed in gaseous hydrogen thereby evaluating the effects of external hydrogen on property degradation. The slow diffusivity of hydrogen in austenite at room temperature can often be a limiting factor in external hydrogen tests and may not properly characterize lower bound fracture behavior in components exposed to hydrogen for long time periods. In this study, the differences between internal and external hydrogen environments are evaluated in the context of fracture resistance measurements. Fracture testing was performed on two different forged austenitic stainless steel alloys (304L and XM-11) in three different environments: 1) non-charged and tested in gaseous hydrogen at pressure of 1,000 bar (external H2), 2) hydrogen precharged and tested in air (internal H), 3) hydrogen precharged and tested in 1,000 bar H2 (internal H + external H2). For all environments, elastic-plastic fracture measurements were conducted to establish J-R curves following the methods of ASTM E1820. Following fracture testing, fracture surfaces were examined to reveal predominant fracture mechanisms for the different conditions and to characterize differences (and similarities) in the macroscale fracture processes associated with these environmental conditions.