THE ROLE OF INTENTION AND CONVENTION IN INTERPRETING ARTWORKS

Abstract

The Southern Journal of PhilosophyVolume 31, Issue 4 p. 471-489 THE ROLE OF INTENTION AND CONVENTION IN INTERPRETING ARTWORKS Robert Stecker, Robert Stecker Central Michigan University Robert Stecker is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Central Michigan University. He is the author of numerous articles in aesthetics, the philosophy of mind, and the history of modern philosophy. “Art Interpretation,” a companion piece to the present paper will appear in the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism in spring, 1994.Search for more papers by this author Robert Stecker, Robert Stecker Central Michigan University Robert Stecker is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Central Michigan University. He is the author of numerous articles in aesthetics, the philosophy of mind, and the history of modern philosophy. “Art Interpretation,” a companion piece to the present paper will appear in the Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism in spring, 1994.Search for more papers by this author First published: Winter 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1993.tb00687.xCitations: 3 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume31, Issue4Winter 1993Pages 471-489 RelatedInformation