Abstract
Studying the role of IHC analysis in the differential diagnosis of APT and PC. The study included 44 patients with morphologic diagnosis of the APT established after surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism on the basis of Endocrinology Research Centre during 2018-2023. All cases underwent IHC examination with evaluation of CD31/CD34 and parathormone (PTH) expression for identification of vascular invasion, Ki-67, parafibromin. According to the results of IHC analysis in 8/44 patients (18.2%) the diagnosis of APT was revised in favor of the PC: in 7 of them vascular invasion was detected; in 1 patient the additional series of slices in the surrounding fatty tissue revealed foci of tumor growth, confirmed by positive reaction with antibodies to PTH. According to IHC results, the material was divided into 2 groups: APT and PC. There were no differences in clinical and morphological characteristics, Ki-67% level and parafibromin expression between the groups. Assessment of clinical and laboratory-instrumental data at the preoperative stage does not allow differentiating APT from PC. In case of APT diagnosis and detection of suspicious morphological features, it is necessary to perform IHC examination to exclude PC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
