Abstract
Regions are often understood as social and discursive constructs that are perpetually at the heart of the politics of spatial distinctions. Although regions transform over time, they are used in collective discourses as ways of structuring space and they can become important elements for individual identity narratives and practices. The proponents of the competitiveness rhetoric increasingly utilize the ideas of social capital and trust positing that regions are knowingly responsible for their affluence and economic growth. In Finland, various institutional agents have operationalized provincial spaces as imperative policy instruments. At the same time, their meaning has remained rather ambiguous to their citizens, whose spatial identifications can be eclectic and reflexive. This article focuses on one particular region, Paijat-Hame in southern Finland to uncover why the supposed internal cohesion does not seem to manifest at the provincial level. The paper approaches regional identity from two angles. First, it scrutinizes how regional actors conceptualize the region and how they facilitate regional identity discourses, and second, it analyses how individuals construct their spatial identities and belonging and studies the meaning of the institutionalized region in this process. The empirical material consists of eleven interviews with institutional actors representing regional policy, trade, education and media and four focus group interviews with locally- or universally-inclined social movements representing the general public. In this article, I argue that historical fractures and differently aligned spatial strategies can hinder attempts to reconfigure regional identities, and by implication, development discourses. I also indicate that while the province does not necessarily provide compelling identity materials, the need to belong has not disappeared in the currents of globalization.
Highlights
Regions are often understood as social and discursive constructs that are perpetually at the heart of politics of spatial distinctions
Regional identity has become a buzzword in some strands of political, urban and cultural geography and in regional development practice
The idea of palimpsest, applicable to basically every region, addresses the need to understand the institutionalization of regions (Paasi 1986) as an asynchronous process where different socio-spatial practices and discourses are simultaneously used in everyday life and in media and in the sometimes closed circuits of professionally positioned regional actors
Summary
Regions are often understood as social and discursive constructs that are perpetually at the heart of politics of spatial distinctions. Their meanings are mediated by time in an evolutionary fashion that is echoed in an observation from Henri Bergson (1911: 2), ‘We change without ceasing’. Regions can become natural and mundane parts of people’s spatial identities. The transformation of collective regional identity discourses is a lingering process. The ways citizens value regionalism, are affected by regional emblems and picture its territory cannot be changed overnight. The residues of past cultural practices and meanings persist as long as people believe in and make claims on them (Paasi 2002a)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
