Abstract

• We study ICT communication in collective management of public bads by potato farmers. • We design an experimental, framed, public bads game and manipulate the ICT variable. • ICT communication has a significant positive effect on cooperative behaviour. • It enhances disease control and returns on investment at early stage of ICT literacy. • It enables coordination, collective norms, reputation and freeriders pressuring. What is the role of Information and Communication Technology in the collective management of public bads? We study epidemics of late blight in potato as a collective action challenge in Oromia, Ethiopia. As a highly infectious, air-borne disease, potato late blight represents a public bad: it is non-excludable and non-rival. Managing public bads is a major policy challenge in Ethiopia due to structural inefficiencies and resource constraints to formal interventions. Dispersed rural farmers lack capacity and infrastructure to maintain communication flows that are key for effective collective action. We introduce an experimental, framed, public bads game where randomly selected groups of potato farmers are presented with a collective action dilemma whether to invest in a joint initiative to control late blight (fungicide spraying) or to suffer productivity loss if the threshold is missed. We also manipulate the ICT-mediated communication variable by providing access to a smartphone-based group communicator to a random sub-sample of the participants. We find that collective action problems do occur and participants tend to free-ride on the efforts of others. We show that ICT-mediated communication has a statistically significant positive effect on cooperative behavior, disease control, returns on investment and game winnings. Our qualitative analysis of the voice chats provides evidence that farmers use ICT to: (1) facilitate complex coordination, (2) establish collective norms, (3) detect and pressure 'free riders', and (4) manage reputation to increase trust. This paper complements the existing literature on public bads by studying real-life stakeholders in a real-life collective action challenge. It contributes to the literature on the contested topic of 'ICTrevolution' and its supposed transforming effect on African agriculture. From the point of view of policy, we draw attention to the pivotal importance of improving communication infrastructure in rural regions of Ethiopia, and the opportunities to scale collective action interventions through ICT.

Highlights

  • Collective action problems are collaboration deficits that hinder joint action in the pursuit of a common goal by groups of stakeholders (Hardin, 1982; Olson, 1965)

  • Our findings provide a theoretical base to assume that the growing popularity of ICT holds considerable promise to attenuate collective action problems that often arise in agro-eco systems

  • Our results indicate that collective action problems do occur: only 41.7% of our control group managed to reach the threshold number of ‘sprayings’ to avoid potato late blight epidemics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collective action problems are collaboration deficits that hinder joint action in the pursuit of a common goal by groups of stakeholders (Hardin, 1982; Olson, 1965). They arise as a result of high individual costs of contribution to the management of the shared resource with uncertain personal benefits and imperfect information (Bodin, 2017; Ostrom, 1990). Research proves that these problems can be overcome if stakeholders manage to install and maintain peer-to-peer information flows and open communication channels (Nowak et al, 2002; Ostrom, 1998; Smith, 2010; Van de Kragt et al, 1983).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call