Abstract
AbstractThe proposition that hydrolysis may account for the selective adsorption of heavy metals by clay surfaces is compared with an alternate explanation of specific exchange of the metal with weakly dissociable H+. It is shown that past evidence offered in support of the two hypotheses is somewhat ambiguous. Theoretical treatment is presented for the competition of ions in adsorption reactions which provides a means of distinguishing between the two alternatives through the effect of H+ on the metal‐clay reaction in the presence of a competing ion. Experimentally, the effect of H+ on the reaction of Co2+ with montmorillonite is studied in the presence and absence of Mg2+, a weakly competing ion. Ionic strength is held constant, and nonspecific reactions are minimized with an excess of CaCl2. The results are interpreted as favoring the hydrolysis hypothesis. Inherent assumptions are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.