Abstract

Forty children in the three primary grades were studied to determine if they would donate more to a worthy cause after having been exposed to a humorous situation or to a serious one. The children who had just heard, a serious story about sharing donated slightly more to help Ethiopian refugees than did children who had just heard humorous stories. The difference, however, was not significant. Children who scored higher on Damon's scale of distributive justice donated significantly more, as did girls. It is argued that classroom discussions and activities concerning important issues could sometimes benefit from a less serious approach than is traditionally used.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.