The role of high density mapping in cathether ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - preliminary results

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Despite technical progress and numerous approaches in ablation strategies, long-term success in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) treatment is still suboptimal. Non-transmural ablation lesions in antral isolation lines, causing late electrical reconnection between pulmonary veins (PVs) and left atrium (LA) could present one of the potenital issues for reduced effectiveness of radiofrequency cathether ablation (RFCA). Potentially, these lesions can be identified with high-density (HD) mapping as low voltage, fragmented electrocardiograms (LFEGMs) representing gaps in antral isolation lines. Purpose To compare the long-term pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability of two PVI verification methods (circumferential vs high-density mapping catheter) after catheter ablation of PAF. Methods Thirty-three patients with PAF were prospectively randomized to PVI verification by either circumferential mapping catheter (CM group) or HD mapping catheter (HD group). Patients in both groups underwent PVI according to the CLOSE protocol with PVI verification after a 30 minute waiting period. Additionally, in the HD group antral ablation lines were mapped to search for LFEGMs that were defined as fragmented signals (at least 3 deflections) and/or conduction to the LA during stimulation on the ablation line (10 mA at 1 msec) and/or voltage amplitude above 0.1 mV. If LFEGMs were found, additional ablations were performed until electrical inactivity was confirmed with the HD catheter. To monitor AF reccurence 6-day continuous holter ECG was performed after 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial procedure. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting more than 30 seconds. Patients also underwent a mandatory second procedure 12 months after the initial PVI, during which HD re-mapping was performed to test durability of PVI and absence of conducting gaps in antral isolation lines. Results There were 16 patients in the CM group and 17 patients in the HD group. Baseline characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, LA volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction, CHA2DS2VASc score) did not significantly differ between the groups. Procedural characteristic are summarized in Table 1. There were significantly more isolated PVs at the remapping procedure in the HD group compared to the CM group (91.2% (62/68) vs 75.0% (48/64); P=0.021). There were also significantly more patients with all PVs durably isolated in the HD group (82.4% (14/17) vs 37.5% (6/16); P=0.008). However, arrhythmia recurrence rate was similiar between the CM and HD group (43.8% (7/16) vs 35.3% (6/17); P=0.640). Conclusion HD mapping improved PVI durability after 12 months compared to standard CM verification. However, lower number of isolated PVs in the HD group did not have an impact on arrhythmia reccurence.