Abstract

The disruptions to wildland fires, such as firebreaks, roads and rivers, can limit the spread of wildfire propagating through surface or crown fire. A large forest can be separated into different zones by carefully constructing firebreaks through modification of vegetation in firebreak regions. However, the wildland fire behaviour can be unpredictable due to the presence of either wind- or buoyancy-driven flow in the fire. In this study, we aim to test the efficacy of an idealised firebreak constructed by unburned vegetation. The physics-based large eddy simulation (LES) simulation is conducted using Wildland–urban interface Fire Dynamic Simulator (WFDS). We have carefully chosen different wind velocities with low to high values, 2.5~12.5 m/s, so the different fire behaviours can be studied. The behaviour of surface fire is studied by Australian grassland vegetation, while the crown fire is represented by placing cone-shaped trees with grass underneath. With varying velocity and vegetation, four values of firebreak widths (Lc), ranging from 5~20 m, is tested for successful break distance needed for the firebreak. For each failure or successful firebreak width, we have assessed the characteristics of fire intensity, mechanism of heat transfer, heat flux, and surface temperature. It was found that with the inclusion of forest trees, the heat release rate (HRR) increased substantially due to greater amount of fuel involved. The non-dimensional Byram’s convective number (NC) was calculated, which justifies simulated heat flux and fire characteristics. For each case, HRR, total heat fluxes, total preheat flux, total preheat radiation and convective heat flux, surface temperature and fire propagation mode are presented in the details. Some threshold heat flux was observed on the far side of the firebreak and further studies are needed to identify them conclusively.

Highlights

  • For managing wildland fires, the traditional approach is to deploy firefighters to control fire with the help of different suppression techniques

  • We focus on the role of heat flux and surface temperature in the efficacy of firebreaks

  • TThhee ssiimmuullaattiioonnrreessuultlstsaraereprpesreensetendteidn binothboqtuhanqtuitaantitviteaatinvdeqaunadlitqatuivaelitmatainvneemrsanners wwhheerree aapppplliiccaabblel.e.AAlthltohuoguhgthhetehffieceacffyicoafctyheofifretbhreeafkiriesbfurenadkamisenftuanl dasapmecetntotatlhiasssptuedcty,to this stttuhhdee ycbh,eahthraaevcitcoehurairsrtoaifccswteoirlfdihsfiteiracetssfliounfxth,hfieearpetrifenlsuteexnn,csefiitroye,faainnfidtreetnebmsrietpayek,rabatnuuidrltetiaenrmeWpaUlesrIoaovtruiteralesl etaowruehneardlese.orIsntvaitnthadel to undfeorlslotawnidngthsuebbseechtaiovniso,uthreorfeswuiltlsdofifrtews einntythseimpurleastieonncsearoef saumfirmeabrriesaedk hbiughilltigihntiWngUthI eor elsewrholeereo.f hIneatthfleuxfoilnloawn iidnegalsiusebdseficrteibornesa,k tbhueiltreinsusultrsfaocfe tawndencrtyowsnimfiurelsa.tions are summarised highlighting the role of heat flux in an idealised firebreak built in surface and crown fires

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The traditional approach is to deploy firefighters to control fire with the help of different suppression techniques. This study incorporates realistic surface vegetation as grass and forest trees as crown vegetation together to investigate flow dynamics, fire intensity, preheat flux after the Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1395 study incorporates realistic surface vegetation as grass and forest trees as crown vegetation together to investigate flow dynamics, fire intensity, preheat flux after the firebreak, mechanism of heat transfer, a relative comparison of radiation and convective heat flux in morfieredberteaailkt,hmateccahnanpirsomvidofehinesaitgthrtantosfoepr,eararteinlagtiavgeecnocmiespainridsoensigonf irnagdiaaftiiroenbraenadkcinonWveUcItive andhienatthfleumxidindlme oorfeadfoertaesilt.that can provide insight to operating agencies in designing a firebreak in WUI and in the middle of a forest. TThhee ssiimmuullaattiioonnrreessuultlstsaraereprpesreensetendteidn binothboqtuhanqtuitaantitviteaatinvdeqaunadlitqatuivaelitmatainvneemrsanners wwhheerree aapppplliiccaabblel.e.AAlthltohuoguhgthhetehffieceacffyicoafctyheofifretbhreeafkiriesbfurenadkamisenftuanl dasapmecetntotatlhiasssptuedcty,to this stttuhhdee ycbh,eahthraaevcitcoehurairsrtoaifccswteoirlfdihsfiteiracetssfliounfxth,hfieearpetrifenlsuteexnn,csefiitroye,faainnfidtreetnebmsrietpayek,rabatnuuidrltetiaenrmeWpaUlesrIoaovtruiteralesl etaowruehneardlese.orIsntvaitnthadel to undfeorlslotawnidngthsuebbseechtaiovniso,uthreorfeswuiltlsdofifrtews einntythseimpurleastieonncsearoef saumfirmeabrriesaedk hbiughilltigihntiWngUthI eor elsewrholeereo.f hIneatthfleuxfoilnloawn iidnegalsiusebdseficrteibornesa,k tbhueiltreinsusultrsfaocfe tawndencrtyowsnimfiurelsa.tions are summarised highlighting the role of heat flux in an idealised firebreak built in surface and crown fires

Effect of Firebreak
Heat Release Rate
Mechanism of Heat Flux
Heat Flux in Vegetation Burning
Findings
Preheat Flux after Firebreak

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.