Abstract

Knowledge of headwater influences on the water-quality and flow conditions of downstream waters is essential to water-resource management at all governmental levels; this includes recent court decisions on the jurisdiction of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) over upland areas that contribute to larger downstream water bodies. We review current watershed research and use a water-quality model to investigate headwater influences on downstream receiving waters. Our evaluations demonstrate the intrinsic connections of headwaters to landscape processes and downstream waters through their influence on the supply, transport, and fate of water and solutes in watersheds. Hydrological processes in headwater catchments control the recharge of subsurface water stores, flow paths, and residence times of water throughout landscapes. The dynamic coupling of hydrological and biogeochemical processes in upland streams further controls the chemical form, timing, and longitudinal distances of solute transport to downstream waters. We apply the spatially explicit, mass-balance watershed model SPARROW to consider transport and transformations of water and nutrients throughout stream networks in the northeastern United States. We simulate fluxes of nitrogen, a primary nutrient that is a water-quality concern for acidification of streams and lakes and eutrophication of coastal waters, and refine the model structure to include literature observations of nitrogen removal in streams and lakes. We quantify nitrogen transport from headwaters to downstream navigable waters, where headwaters are defined within the model as first-order, perennial streams that include flow and nitrogen contributions from smaller, intermittent and ephemeral streams. We find that first-order headwaters contribute approximately 70% of the mean-annual water volume and 65% of the nitrogen flux in second-order streams. Their contributions to mean water volume and nitrogen flux decline only marginally to about 55% and 40% in fourth- and higher-order rivers that include navigable waters and their tributaries. These results underscore the profound influence that headwater areas have on shaping downstream water quantity and water quality. The results have relevance to water-resource management and regulatory decisions and potentially broaden understanding of the spatial extent of Federal CWA jurisdiction in U.S. waters.

Highlights

  • Recent U.S Supreme Court rulings, related to Clean Water Act (CWA) decisions by federal regulatory agencies (U.S Army Corps of Engineers and U.S Environmental Protection Agency), underscore the need for an improved scientific understanding of the influence of headwater areas and upland streams on the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of downstream waters, especially those legally classified as ‘‘navigable.’’ An important 2001 U.S Supreme Court ruling

  • The results provide scientific information that potentially broadens understanding of the extent of Federal CWA jurisdiction in waters of the United States, a topic of continuing importance as indicated by recent U.S Supreme Court cases

  • The procedures for establishing Federal jurisdiction that have emerged from these cases stress the need for technical and scientific information about whether a ‘‘significant nexus’’ exists between upland waters and downstream navigable waters and their tributaries

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Recent U.S Supreme Court rulings, related to Clean Water Act (CWA) decisions by federal regulatory agencies (U.S Army Corps of Engineers and U.S Environmental Protection Agency), underscore the need for an improved scientific understanding of the influence of headwater areas and upland (loworder) streams on the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of downstream waters, especially those legally classified as ‘‘navigable.’’ An important 2001 U.S Supreme Court ruling Nitrogen flux in streams and rivers of any size is the cumulative result of processes that control the supply and transport of nitrogen in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems These occur throughout the watershed system from the headwater source areas to the downstream receiving waters (Howarth et al, 1996; Seitzinger et al, 2002; Van Breemen et al, 2002; McClain et al, 2003). The temporal variation of nitrogen in the stream (Figure 1) is tightly linked to cycles of water (e.g., influence of spring snowmelt and associated runoff) and carbon (e.g., in dissolved organic forms, DOC), and reflects contributions of flow and solutes from both upland hillslopes and near stream riparian zones of the landscape (McGlynn et al, 1999; Shanley, 2000) Such results are not limited only to small catchments, but are observed at all watershed scales. Nitrogen sources and fate have been studied for over 30 years in the large Fall Creek watershed

30 Temperature
Results of the Model Estimation
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call