Abstract

Financial constraints in smallholder agriculture remain pervasive in developing countries like Ethiopia. The government of Ethiopia is doing its best to tackle the financial bottleneck through financial inclusion and several institutional arrangements that hinder smallholders’ agriculture that represent the landslide figure in the country. This review is aimed at finding financial institutions serving smallholders in the country, evaluating the mode of service delivery of financial institutions regarding smallholder development, exploring the challenges of financial institutions, and examining the challenges that hinder smallholders in accessing services from financial institutions. There are formal, semi-formal, and informal institutions are delivering service packages to alleviate the smallholders’ financial problems through credit, saving, insurance, and to some extent, insurance services. In terms of terms, formal financial institutions (banks and insurance companies) have virtually no access to the rural population; they are all located in urban and semi-urban towns, classify smallholder agriculture as a risky business, discriminate against smallholders, and require collateral that smallholders cannot provide. However, they reach smallholders indirectly through loans they provide to the MFIs. MFIs and RuSACCOs are the main formal and semi-formal institutions that are mainly established on a poverty lending approach. Startup capital supply for SMEs is attached to MFIs indifferently. They are serving smallholders through loan provision and saving and have devised a group lending scheme where members will be accountable for others. Despite the financial inclusion proclamation, MFIs are dominated by the ruling political party. However, they are the most profound financial institutions that serve smallholders and the poorest segment of the population. Despite the tremendous expansion, progress, and the enormous resources mobilized by financial institutions in the country, especially MFIs and RuSACCOs, a substantial proportion of the rural population remains underserved. Due to the one-size-fits-all services of MFIs and the limitation of funds to expand clients, extremely low uptake and sluggish penetration of the credit service to smallholders indicates the prevalence of unbanked and untapped financial potential. Therefore, 80 percent of the poor and smallholders depend on the informal financial sector, mainly on Iqqub, Iddir, and money lenders, since they are culture-appropriate, flexible, easily accessible, and cost-effective. Insurance endeavors are rarely known in Ethiopian smallholders’ context despite its necessity. Thus, strengthening the capacities of MFIs and RuSACCOs, linking need-based input credit, designing a credit guarantee scheme, connecting these institutions with other government payment schemes, meeting the credit demands of commercial, semi-commercial, and subsistence smallholders, and launching and scaling up WII on a micro-insurance platform are all essential. Keywords: Financial institutions, formal, informal, semi-formal, smallholder agriculture DOI: 10.7176/EJBM/14-1-03 Publication date: January 31 st 2022

Highlights

  • The information obtained was categorized into three themes as formal, semi-formal, and informal financial institutions’ contribution to the wellbeing of smallholders in Ethiopia

  • Various keywords used to search from the electronic literature include financial institutions, smallholders, formal financial institutions, semi-formal, informal, rural financial markets, Iqqub, Iddir, saving and credit organizations, and financial inclusion

  • Reports indicate that the expansion of public and private banks and insurance companies as well as other semi-formal financial institutions like saving and credit cooperatives is tremendous

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the 21 FAO-relevant SDG indicators, two are associated with target 2.3. This target envisages, in particular, doubling, by 2030, “the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular women, indigenous people, family farmers, pastoralists and fishers, including through secure and equal access to land, other productive resources, and inputs, knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment.”. Smallholder farming is the dominant division of Ethiopian agriculture and remained an important integral part to achieve food security since they cultivate about 95% of the cropped land and produce above 90% of the agricultural output thereby tremendously contributing to the national GDP increment

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.