Abstract

The influence of different fertilization practices on the growth, yield and inner quality of carrot (Daucus carota L.) was studied. The field experiments were carried out in Southern Finland, on the experimental farm of Kemira Oy, in 1985 and 1986. Unirrigated and irrigated placement and broadcast fertilization, NPK fertirrigations without or with basic fertilization, and PK placement with N fertirrigations were compared. Placement and broadcast fertilizations were carried out by single application, whereas NPK or N fertirrigations were performed as split applications. The highest yields were obtained when the total phytomass production was high. The yield increased by the placement of NPK fertilizer as compared to broadcast fertilization, and by the placement of P and K as compared to treatments where P and K were broadcasted or fertirrigated. The PK placement with N fertirrigations increased the root dry matter content as compared to NPK fertirrigations. The lowest NO3-N contents of roots were obtained by unirrigated placement fertilization. NPK fertirrigations caused higher root NO3-N contents than any other fertilization practice, and irrigation as such increased the NO3-N contents. Root N and P contents were increased by placement of PK or NPK fertilizers, but fertilization practices had no effects on K, Mg and Ca contents. Single application increased ash and dietary fibre contents as compared to split applications. In conclusion, the placement of NPK or PK fertilizers had positive effects on the above mentioned quality criteria and yield, and thus in future research and in commercial vegetable production these fertilization practices should be utilized. Fertilization practices had no or only slight effects on the carotene and sugar contents, taste, texture and the quality of stored carrots. Carotene content increased as the growing season progressed, and was 41 % higher in the climatically more favourable year 1986 than in 1985. Total sugar contents were higher in the climatically less favourable year 1985 and in unfertilized treatments than in 1986 and in fertilized treatments. It was hypothesized that carrot sugar contents are related to growth and total phytomass production. The indicative results showed that the NPK fertirrigations without basic fertilization had a slight positive effect on carrot taste and texture as compared to placement fertilization but, on the other hand, the NPK fertirrigations without basic fertilization showed a tendency to impair the storage ability as compared to single application. In conclusion, carotene and sugar contents are strongly influenced by genotype and climate and thus it is logical that the effects of fertilization practices remained slight. The results of carrot taste do not allow any final conclusions to be drawn; further investigation on the subject is needed.

Highlights

  • The quality of vegetables is influenced by genotype, climate and soil as well as by cultivation practices, harvest, storage and marketing

  • The most common fertilization practice still is broadcast fertilization, placement fertilization has been shown to improve the yields of many crops (Cooke et al 1956, Varis and Lannetta 1974, Lyngstad 1977, Mulkey et al 1979, Ekeberg 1986)

  • The nutrient level used in the present experiment was chosen according to the practice in Finnish carrot production, but because the placement fertilization has been shown to increase the fertilizer efficiency, the difference in carrot yields between placement method and other application methods would probably have been even bigger if a lower nutrient level had been used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern vegetable cultivation aims to even and high-quality products. Quality can be classified as to outer quality (size, form, colour) and inner quality (nutritionally important factors, nutritionally negative factors, taste and texture). The quality classification is modified case by case, according to each specific purpose for which the vegetables are produced. Inexpensive and reliable measurement technology has made it impossible to classify and price the products according to inner quality. The nutritionally important inner quality criteria include nutritional fibre, sugars, proteins and essential aminoacids, minerals, vitamins and provitamins, organic acids, essential fatty acids and aroma compounds. The nutritionally negative quality criteria include nitrate content, pesticide residues, heavy metal and radioactivity contents, oxalic acid, free amino acids and aroma compounds that give a bad taste, making e.g. the carrot bitter or harsh

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call