Abstract

Assessing the human affective state using electroencephalography (EEG) have shown good potential but failed to demonstrate reliable performance in real-life applications. Especially if one applies a setup that might impact affective processing and relies on generalized models of affect. Additionally, using subjective assessment of ones affect as ground truth has often been disputed. To shed the light on the former challenge we explored the use of a convenient EEG system with 20 participants to capture their reaction to affective movie clips in a naturalistic setting. Employing state-of-the-art machine learning approach demonstrated that the highest performance is reached when combining linear features, namely symmetry features and single-channel features, with nonlinear ones derived by a multiscale entropy approach. Nevertheless, the best performance, reflected in the highest F1-score achieved in a binary classification task for valence was 0.71 and for arousal 0.62. The performance was 10–20% better compared to using ratings provided by 13 independent raters. We argue that affective self-assessment might be underrated and it is crucial to account for personal differences in both perception and physiological response to affective cues.

Highlights

  • The use of physiological signals is a preferred choice for objective assessment of emotions in humans as it is closely associated with processes emanating from both the central nervous system and the autonomic nervous system

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are used to assess the emotional state of a person [2], they can bias subjects’ emotional state as he/she is placed in an environment that is quite different from a typical daily setting and that can per se impact the emotional state [3,4]

  • We evaluate the subjective assessment of the emotional state by subjects participating in the EEG study, to those from independent raters, who provided arousal and valence scores for the emotional content of each movie clip

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of physiological signals is a preferred choice for objective assessment of emotions in humans as it is closely associated with processes emanating from both the central nervous system and the autonomic nervous system. Reliable monitoring of limbic activity requires the use of technology that can monitor deep brain structures, e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using non-invasive surface electroencephalography (EEG) is currently seen as the most appropriate measurement modality for characterizing emotional processes [5,6,7]. It does not require complex measurement equipment or invasive procedures and allows data acquisition in natural settings.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call