Abstract

Drawing on survey data on individuals’ motives for migration in Sweden (N = 2172), we examine the importance of family and friends for return versus onward migration, including their importance for different age groups and in different communities on the rural–urban spectrum. The results point to a significant relationship between the importance of family and return versus onward migration, with family importance decreasing with age among returning migrants. At the same time, the importance of friends for returning increases with age. The findings did not suggest a significant relationship between urbanicity and returning versus migration elsewhere. Based on a subset of respondents who were employed prior to migrating (n = 1056), we further examined labor market outcomes for onward versus returning migrants. The results broadly indicate that return migrations are linked to lower likelihoods of labor market deterioration and improvement, suggesting greater labor market stability for return vis-à-vis onward migrations. However, the importance of family for returning (versus moving elsewhere) is associated with higher likelihoods of labor market deterioration and improvement compared with staying the same, indicating greater volatility in labor market outcomes when the importance of family is considered.

Highlights

  • For quite some time, return migration has received scholarly attention as a unique type of migration, with different characteristics and causes than other types (e.g., DaVanzo & Morrison, 1981; Newbold & Liaw, 1990)

  • We focused on how this importance differed by age and urbanicity

  • Given the importance of nonresident family-motivated migration for labor market outcomes (Gillespie et al, 2020), we further examined how return migration impacts labor market outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Return migration has received scholarly attention as a unique type of migration, with different characteristics and causes than other types (e.g., DaVanzo & Morrison, 1981; Newbold & Liaw, 1990). Given that previous research on the importance of family for return migration has been based on a small sample or specific age range (e.g., Mulder et al, 2020; von Reichert et al, 2014a; Zorlu & Kooiman, 2019), there has been no systematic exploration of potential differences across age groups. The impetus for moving back versus moving onward (e.g., DaVanzo & Morrison, 1981) Another important issue to explore is labor market consequences after return migration. Given the limited work with this focus, the second main objective of our study is to examine labor market outcomes associated with Swedish return migration, especially in light of return migration for family and friends. We use logistic regression to explore return versus onward migration, and multinomial logistic regression of deterioration or improvement in labor market outcomes (versus staying the same) following migration

Literature Review
Results
Discussion and Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call