Abstract

This article examines the role of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in counter-radicalization in Nigeria, with emphasis on the Boko Haram terrorist group operating in northeast Nigeria and the greater Lake Chad region. A qualitative methodological approach is employed that makes use of primary and secondary documents, key informant and stakeholder interviews, and focus group discussions with critical religious actors and organizations. The findings of the article suggest that FBOs play a critical role in the disengagement and deradicalization process of countering the ideological and radical messages of Boko Haram. However, challenges such as the lack of effective stakeholder involvement in the various initiatives by the state in counterterrorism, fear of reprisal and attacks, lack of unison by various FBOs and clerics in countering these negative messages, and the inability of relevant stakeholders in addressing structural factors such as poverty, social and economic exclusion, and unemployment that give rise to radicalization amongst other challenges, have impeded the effectiveness of the FBO sector in its counter-radicalization efforts in Nigeria. To address these challenges, the article proposes a bottom-up approach to counterterrorism that provides room for the multi-sectoral involvement of major stakeholders, especially FBOs, to complement pre-existing initiatives and other measures to counter the negative weaponization of religion by radical and rogue clerics, and also to prevent Boko Haram from expanding its frontiers.

Highlights

  • Faith-based organizations (FBOs) usually play a critical role in the debates and discourse(s) regarding radicalization, counter-radicalization, violent religious extremism, and terrorism (Cozzens 2006; Rubin et al 2011; Khalil 2012; Arshad-Ayaz and Naseem 2017)

  • These groups comprised leaders of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the Jama’atu Nasrul Islam (JNI); leadership and clerics of denominations and sects such as the Church of Christ in Nations (COCIN), The Evangelical Church Winning All (ECWA), Ekklesiyar Yan’uwa a Nigeria (EYN), and the Tijaniyya brotherhood; academics and experts on the issues related to radicalization, terrorism, and violent extremism whose long-standing contributions and scholarship regarding the topic under investigation are clear

  • Other studies have revealed that these radio and talk shows have had a positive impact in shaping viewers’ and listeners’ values and beliefs about the dangers associated with radicalization and other forms of violent extremism that promote the presence and activities of Boko Haram in Nigeria and the greater Lake Chad region (Marrone et al 2020). This is a good example of religious leaders and FBOs agreeing to coordinate their efforts to counter these negative doctrinal elements and teachings in society. It is important for the relevant stakeholders to understand that despite the precarious nature of the resilience, actions, and activities of Boko Haram, FBOs have played a very significant role in countering the radicalization and recruitment of the weak and vulnerable into Boko Haram, and used their platforms to continuously preach peace, promote mutual trust, and ensure that the negative doctrinal elements used by certain rogue and radical clerics are contained in order to deter individuals and groups from being sympathetic towards Boko Haram in Nigeria and the Lake Chad region through winning the hearts and minds of all

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Faith-based organizations (FBOs) usually play a critical role in the debates and discourse(s) regarding radicalization, counter-radicalization, violent religious extremism, and terrorism (Cozzens 2006; Rubin et al 2011; Khalil 2012; Arshad-Ayaz and Naseem 2017). The activities of this group have further created a serious humanitarian challenge in the region, with over 2.7 million persons displaced across territories with a Boko Haram presence (UNHCR 2020) From this informed perspective, several studies have focused on the state-centric approach prioritizing the traditional role of the state in countering the activities of this violent radical group, through the use of force or the military, while the non-military (soft and smart power) approach to counter radicalization remains largely underdeveloped (Falode 2016; Sampson 2016; Onapajo 2017; Agbiboa 2020; Martin 2020; Onapajo and Ozden 2020). The sixth part of the article presents the conclusion and policy implications of the study

Methodology
Counter-Radicalization
Radicalization and Counter-Radicalization
Challenges Facing FBOs in Countering Boko Haram Radicalization
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call