Abstract
Lin suggests that exit rights are necessary for the existence of efficient self-enforcing contracts. This view has recently been criticized by Dong and Dow and Putterman and Skillman who argue precisely the opposite, namely that exit costs are necessary for the existence of self-enforcing contracts, as originally shown in MacLeod. First I reiterate some points made in MacLeod that imply the Chinese cooperatives would have been a failure regardless of the level of exit costs. Second, the kinds of exit costs needed for the existence of self-enforcing contracts are essentially voluntary and would never take the form of forced collectivization as observed in China. In the context of the Chinese experiment, exit rights would most probably have averted a disaster because peasants would have had the choice of not joining an organization they believed to be inefficient. In the final section, I discuss the use of game theoretic models to address organizational issues and make some suggestions for future research directions. J. Comp. Econom., June 1993, 17(2), pp. 521-529. Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.