Abstract

It is currently assumed that exposure to an artificial blue-enriched light enhances human alertness and task performance, but recent research has suggested that behavioral effects are influenced by the basal state of arousal. Here, we tested whether the effect of blue-enriched lighting on vigilance performance depends on participants’ arousal level. Twenty-four participants completed four sessions (blue-enriched vs. dim light × low vs. high arousal) at 10 pm on four consecutive days, following a repeated-measures design. Participants’ arousal was manipulated parametrically through the execution of a cycling task at two intensities (low vs. moderate), and was checked by monitoring their heart rate. On each session, distal and proximal skin temperatures were recorded as a neuroergonomic index of vigilance, while participants performed a 20-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) under either blue-enriched light or dim light conditions. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE) were used to measure subjective psychological state. The results showed that the exercise-induced manipulation of arousal produced robust alerting effects in most measures, while the lighting manipulation only attenuated subjective sleepiness and enhanced positive affect, but it did not influence behavior or physiology. Acute exposure to a blue-enriched light was practically ineffective when the arousal level was over baseline. The present research favored the use of acute physical exercise over acute exposure to blue-enriched lighting in order to boost humans’ alertness when necessary, as in work settings where maintaining optimal levels of attention is difficult (shift work, night-work, vigilance tasks) and necessary to prevent human error and accidents.

Highlights

  • There consistent evidence supporting the alerting effects of light on subjective and physiological is measures (Cajochen et al, 2000, 2005; Lockley et al, 2006; Smolders and de Kort, 2014)

  • Even though participants reported sleeping more before the blue-enriched light compared with the dim light condition, F(1,23) = 6.73, p = 0.02, η2p = 0.23 (Table 3), the analyses on objective sleep duration using the data from Ambulatory Circadian Monitoring did not confirm an effect of Lighting

  • The ANOVA on lapses revealed no statistically significant effects or interactions. This experiment tested whether a parametric manipulation of basal arousal induced by physical exercise would modulate the alerting effects of a blue-enriched white light on subjective (KSS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)), physiological and behavioral (PVT) measures, in a sample of 24 participants completing four sessions in consecutive days at the beginning of the night (9–10 pm)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There consistent evidence supporting the alerting effects of light on subjective and physiological is measures (Cajochen et al, 2000, 2005; Lockley et al, 2006; Smolders and de Kort, 2014). In Correa et al (2016) study we measured basal vigilance through the PVT, and found that participants with higher vigilance (i.e., responded faster on the PVT) obtained a larger behavioral benefit from the blue-enriched light (vs dim light) than participants with low vigilance in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). This relationship between basal vigilance and light effects was found a posteriori and was based on correlational evidence (i.e., the effect of light on SART RTs was analyzed by controlling for individual differences in basal difference, including PVT performance as a covariate)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call